FIFTH SECTION

CASE OF IVANCHIKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

(Applications nos. 34046/23 and 5 others –

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

28 November 2024

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.


In the case of Ivanchikov and Others v. Ukraine,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Diana Sârcu, President,
 Kateřina Šimáčková,
 Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 7 November 2004,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1.  The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2.  The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

4.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION

5.  The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.

6.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its caselaw regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 12241, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 14959, 10 January 2012).

7.  In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v. Ukraine (no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

8.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. In particular, the Court observes that, in reply to a prima facie case of inadequate conditions of detention, complained of by the applicants, the Government have failed to provide any primary evidence showing cell floor plans and the actual number of inmates during the specific periods of the applicants’ detention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 123, and, for example, Sparysh and Kutsmand v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, 12 September 2024). Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate.

9.  The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.

10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

11.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its caselaw (see, in particular, Sukachov, cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Declares the applications admissible;
  3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law;
  4. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 November 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Sârcu
 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention

(inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m per inmate

Specific grievances

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

34046/23

02/09/2023

Ivan Ivanovych IVANCHIKOV

1997

 

Kulbach Sergiy Oleksandrovych

Limoges

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

25/03/2021 to

03/05/2023

2 year(s) and

1 month(s) and

9 day(s)

2.6-2.7 m²

overcrowding, no or restricted access to shower, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of fresh air, poor quality of potable water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of toiletries, passive smoking, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food

5,200

  1.    

35207/23

10/09/2023

Mykola Stepanovych KOBYLINSKYY

1976

 

Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych

Dnipro

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

13/08/2019

pending

More than

5 year(s) and

1 month(s) and

27 day(s)

2.5 m²

overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower

7,500

  1.    

35262/23

10/09/2023

Eduard Volodymyrovych ZMITROCHENKO

1976

 

Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych

Dnipro

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

29/09/2020 to

27/12/2023

3 year(s) and

2 month(s) and

29 day(s)

3 m²

overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower

7,100

  1.    

35265/23

10/09/2023

Radion Mykolayovych KASHPUR

2004

 

Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych

Dnipro

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

06/02/2020

pending

More than

4 year(s) and

8 month(s) and

4 day(s)

3.5 m²

overcrowding, passive smoking, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower

7,500

  1.    

35466/23

10/09/2023

Artur Andriyovych LEBEDYEV

1998

 

Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych

Dnipro

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

11/02/2022

pending

More than

2 year(s) and

7 month(s) and

22 day(s)

3.5 m²

overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to warm water, lack of toiletries, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, no or restricted access to shower, lack of or insufficient natural light

6,100

  1.    

35471/23

10/09/2023

Volodymyr Andriyovych LEBEDYEV

2005

 

Pustyntsev Andriy Vitaliyovych

Dnipro

Chernihiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility

16/09/2022

pending

More than

2 year(s) and

17 day(s)

3.65 m²

overcrowding, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of toiletries, mouldy or dirty cell, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, poor quality of food, passive smoking

5,000

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.